Legal Opinion
Biton v. Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 22, 2005No. Civ.A. 01-0382(RMC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
Avigail Lewis Biton, individually and on behalf of her children, and Rachel Asraf bring suit under the Antiterrorism Act of 1991 (“ATA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2333, and various tort theories against the Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority, also known as the Palestinian Authority or the Palestinian National Authority (“PA”) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (“PLO”). 1 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Supplemental Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Plaintiffs’ Motion for…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Shekoyan v. Sibley International Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gill v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Biton v. Palestinian Interim Self-Government AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Al-Tamimi v. AdelsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Gill v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Harris v. KoenigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.