Legal Opinion

Harris v. Koenig

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 3, 2011No. Civil Action 02-618 (GK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs William S. Harris, Reginald E. Howard, and Peter M. Thornton, Sr. are former employees of Waste Management Holdings, Inc. (“Old Waste”) and participants in the Waste Management Profit Sharing and Savings Plan (“Old Waste Plan” or “Plan”). They bring this action on behalf of the Plan’s approximately 30,-000 participants under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., against Defendants, 1 all of whom were fiduciaries of the Old Waste Plan 2 or of its successor plan, the Waste Management…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeFazio v. Hollister, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
  2. Moyle v. Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit PlanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  3. (PC) Samaniego v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API