Legal Opinion

Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. Sherburne County

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 2005No. A04-1474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORITSKY * , Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment dismissing appellant-labor union’s claims seeking relief from a county-employer’s unilateral implementation of a random drug-testing policy, established by the county in accordance with Minn.Stat. § 181.951, subd. 4 (2004). We conclude that the establishment of a random drug-testing policy as expressly authorized by statute, including the designation of which employees are in the “safety-sensitive” positions, is not subject to collective bargaining even though it affects the terms and conditions of employment. But aspects of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West St. Paul Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 197Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Minnesota Nurses Association v. McLeod County, Relator, Public Employment Relations Board, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
  3. Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API