Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. Sherburne County
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORITSKY * , Judge.
This appeal is from a summary judgment dismissing appellant-labor union’s claims seeking relief from a county-employer’s unilateral implementation of a random drug-testing policy, established by the county in accordance with Minn.Stat. § 181.951, subd. 4 (2004). We conclude that the establishment of a random drug-testing policy as expressly authorized by statute, including the designation of which employees are in the “safety-sensitive” positions, is not subject to collective bargaining even though it affects the terms and conditions of employment. But aspects of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- West St. Paul Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 197Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Minnesota Nurses Association v. McLeod County, Relator, Public Employment Relations Board, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
- Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012