Legal Opinion
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 2012No. A11-2082Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of his claims under the Minnesota Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act (DATWA), arguing that the district court erroneously applied a two-year statute of limitations to his DATWA claims. We affirm.
FACTS
In May 2011, appellant Terrance Sipe commenced this action, arising out of his joint employment with respondents STS Manufacturing Inc. and Labor Ready/True Blue. Sipe alleges in his complaint that, on April 23, 2008, Labor Ready required him to submit to a drug test and that he complied. Approximately three…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.