Everhart v. PMA Insurance Group
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*175 OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.
In this appeal by allowance we are asked to resolve the issue of whether the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (the “MVFRL”), 75 Pa.C.S. § 1701-1799.7, mandates the “stacking” of uninsured/underinsured (“UM/UIM”) motorist coverage under a commercial fleet policy. The concept of stacking relates to the ability to add coverages from other vehicles and/or different policies to provide a greater amount of coverage available under any one vehicle or policy. McGovern v. Erie Insurance Group, 796 A.2d 343 (Pa.Super.2002). As explained in greater…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Swords v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance v. Pro Design, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Egan v. USI Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Re: Trust Under Deed of D. Kulig Apl of Budke, C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Douglas v. Discover Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.