Legal Opinion

Filer v. Maricopa County

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1948No. 5025PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

R. D. Filer, appellant (plaintiff), brought an action against the County of Maricopa, the County Treasurer, and one William P. Lutfy, appellees (defendants), seeking to quiet his title to:

Lots Five (5) and Six (6), in Block One (1), of South Capitol Addition to the City of Phcenix, Maricopa County, Arizona.

By their answer the county and its treasurer disclaimed any interest in or. to said property. Appellee Lutfy, however, in addition to a motion to dismiss (which was denied) filed an answer alleging that by virtue of two tax deeds he was the owner in fee simple of said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Deatsch v. FairfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Southern Arizona Freight Lines, Ltd. v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Rothman v. RumbeckArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hill v. County of GilaArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Sharpensteen v. SanguinettiArizona Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Petroleum Corp. v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Herman v. HagueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Blackmore v. HonnasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Murphy v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. United Leasing, Inc. v. Commonwealth Land Title Agency of Tucson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API