Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Thompson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1950No. 5142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI; Justice.

Plaintiff and wife Francis M. Murphy and Carrie A. Murphy, respectively, brought separate actions against James A. Thompson, defendant, which actions were consolidated for trial. The actions were for physical and property damages sustained as a result of an automobile accident on May 9, 1948 at 8 p. m. on South Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. From a judgment in favor of defendant plaintiffs appeal

The accident occurred in this manner. Defendant was driving southerly on Central Avenue in his 1942 Ford truck with a 25 foot semi-trailer attached. He passed a car on the left…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Butane Corporation v. KirbyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Hasten v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Weston v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Sharpensteen v. SanguinettiArizona Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. R. A. Manufacturing Co. v. PierceArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. UptainArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ghyselinck v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Robledo v. KoppCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API