Legal Opinion

Rothman v. Rumbeck

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1939No. Civil No. 4086PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

— This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial.

The plaintiff Daisy Meryln Rothman and Dick V. Rumbeck were wife and husband from January 25, 1918, to January 22, 1932. On this last date he obtained a divorce from plaintiff on the ground of desertion and thereafter married the defendant Elizabeth E. Rumbeck, who was his wife when he died on July 8, 1937. On July 26, 1937, defendant was granted letters of administration of her deceased husband’s estate.

On or about October 13, 1937, the plaintiff presented to the defendant administratrix a creditor’s claim for allowance as follows:…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ambrose v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Champion v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Callnon v. CallnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Modern Woodmen of America v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Blaine v. BlaineArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Dressler v. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Lawson v. RidgewayArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. General Petroleum Corp. v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Kingsbery v. KingsberyArizona Supreme Court · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API