Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ward
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Randolph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
On January 14, 1894, at the town of Winchester, the apppellee’s decedent, a fireman on appellant’s engine No. 383, was killed by the collapse of said engine. In this action ' appellee has sought to recover damages for the death of his decedent, alleging that the same was caused by the negligence of the appellant. The jury returned a general verdict for the appellee, answering also certain interrogatories propounded to them. On this appeal, *255it is contended by the appellant that the court- erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
One cause assigned in favor of the motion for a new trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fuller v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railway Co. v. BeyerleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- M. O'Connor & Co. v. GillaspyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- White v. Sun Publishing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Speck v. KenoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Supreme Tent, Knights of the Maccabees of the World v. EthridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Elrod v. PurleeIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.