Legal Opinion

Speck v. Kenoyer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1905No. 20,294PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Erom Newton Circuit Court; Charles W. Hanley, Judge. Petition by Lewis Kenover and others for the establishment of a public highway against which Isaac Y. Speck remonstrates. From a judgment establishing such highway, remonstrant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §133^1 Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.

Proceedings instituted by appellees before the board of commissioners of Newton county to establish a public highway over the lands of appellant. Issues were made by remonstrance on the questions of public utility and damages, and in the circuit court there was a verdict that the proposed highway would be of public utility, and that appellant would not be damaged by its location. Judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict, and the ultimate question^ which are now before us were presented to the lower court by a motion for a new trial.

The first question argued by appellant’s counsel…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Green v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor of the World v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Glendenning v. StahleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Westport Stone Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. DAHL ET UX. v. Northern Ind. Pub. Serv. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Indianapolis Water Co. v. LuxIndiana Supreme Court · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API