Legal Opinion
Consolidated Cosmetics v. Neilson Chemical Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 15, 1952No. 7927PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOSCINSKI, District Judge.
This is a suit for trade-mark infringement and unfair competition in which plaintiffs also seek reversal of a Patent Office decision accepting for registration defendant’s application for an alleged infringing trade-mark.
On October 13, 1945 defendant filed an application in the United States Patent Office, Serial No. 489,918, for registration of its trade-mark Rustaboo for a chemical and detergent preparation for cleaning and preparing metal surfaces for painting. Plaintiff, Consolidated Cosmetics, as marketer of cosmetics, toilet soap, and perfumes under the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Homeowners Group, Inc. v. Home Marketing Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. And Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- R. C. W., Supervisor, Inc. v. Cuban Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Aero-Motive Co. v. U.S. Aeromotive, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- Bunny Bear, Inc. v. Dennis Mitchell IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.