Legal Opinion
Meyers v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 8, 1922No. 23,144PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On September 8, 1922, the following opinion was filed:
Pee Cueiam.
The action is to enjoin defendants from enforcing an alleged void ordinance which prohibits the operation of stone quarries within the city limits wúthout a permit from the council. Plaintiff is the present owner of the stone quarry involved in Brede v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co. 143 Minn. 374, 173 N. W. 805, 6 A. L. R. 1092, and 146 Minn. 406, 178 N. W. 820, 179 N. W. 638, and alleges facts tending to show that it would be useless for him to apply for a permit. The court below granted an order to show cause why a temporary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Brede v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Millett v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State ex rel. Beery v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Remick v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Crescent Oil Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Tousley v. LeachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.