Adams v. Jones
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Initially, we note that the judgment appealed from is interlocutory because, by reserving judgment on the issues of punitive damages and attorney’s fees, the trial court’s judgment fails to dispose of the entire case. Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E.2d 277, reh’g denied, 232 N.C. 744, 59 S.E.2d 429 (1950). Since the judgment appealed from does not affect a substantial right, defendants’ appeal is subject to dismissal. N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1-277 and 7A-27. However, to expedite a decision in this case in order to promote judicial economy, pursuant to Rule 2 of the Rules of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Mapp v. Toyota World, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Kimzay Winston-Salem, Inc. v. JesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Faucette v. 6303 Carmel Road, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- N.C. Central University v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996