Kimzay Winston-Salem, Inc. v. Jester
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
Though defendant’s appeal is dismissible since it is from an interlocutory order that does not affect a substantial right, G.S. 1-277; G.S. 7A-27; Veasey v. City of Durham, 231 N.C. 354, 57 S.E.2d 375 (1950), to prevent manifest injustice to the appellant, and to expedite the end of this overly litigated matter, which was legally set at rest more than nineteen months ago when the default judgment was satisfied, we suspend the rules under the provisions of Rule 2 of our appellate rules and treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari made pursuant to Rule 21(a) and grant it.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Chrisalis Properties, Inc. v. Separate Quarters, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Draughon v. DraughonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brown v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Dawson v. Atlanta Design Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Wolfe v. VillinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- County of Durham v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Croom v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.