Legal Opinion

Davis v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 21PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Roseltha J. Davis against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is an action on the case brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff through the negligent operation of defendant’s street car at a street crossing. After the *241court had announced his opinion, at the close of the proofs, that plaintiff could not recover, and had begun to instruct the jury to that effect, plaintiff asked leave to submit to a nonsuit. This request was refused and a verdict directed. Afterwards counsel for plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, on the grounds that the court erred in refusing to grant a nonsuit and in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deneen v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Molby v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Kolodziejczak v. BakMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Clark v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Obermeier v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API