Legal Opinion
Picking v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 2, 1951No. Civ. No. 1227PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This is an action for false imprisonment against twenty-five defendants and in which damages in the suni of $1,120,050 are claimed. The complaint is a ponderous tome of one hundred fifty-four paragraphs. The plaintiffs, husband and wife, appeared pro se.
Plaintiffs propounded interrogatories to be answered by various defendants, apparently pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. In connection with some of these interrogatories there is now before the Court the following motions:
1. As to defendants G. J. Sweeney, Samuel D. Mackey and J.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Patterson v. DonnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Cheney v. RicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
- Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Robert S. Solomon v. Continental American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Ryan v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.