Legal Opinion

People v. Rizer

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1971No. Crim. 15047PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

On July 30, 1969, defendant pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to a charge of issuing a check without sufficient funds (Pen. Code, § 476a) and in a separate case he entered the same plea to a charge of assault with a caustic chemical (Pen. Code, § 244). As provided in section 1016 of the Penal Code, a defendant who pleads not guilty by reason of insanity, without also pleading not guilty, thereby admits the commission of the underlying offense. After a trial on the sanity issue by the court sitting without a jury, defendant was found to' be sane at the time of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In Re MosleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Mills v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State ex rel. LeBlanc v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API