Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 9, 2002No. AC 20964PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALY, J.
The defendant, Harris Clark, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a court trial, of larceny in the second degree in violation of General *43Statutes § 53a-123 (a) (3)1 and assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the information filed against him was constitutionally defective in that he proceeded to trial without adequate notice of (1) the state’s theory of liability on the charge of assault in the second degree and (2) the precise date on which the crimes charged were alleged to have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Seattle Lake Shore & Eastern Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. McMurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. GastonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. CarneiroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. CabralConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.