Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 11, 2002No. AC 21427PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendant, Robert Smith, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to commit kidnapping in the second degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-94 and 53a-48, and conspiracy to commit larceny in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-122 (a) (3) and 53a-48. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) charged the jury on the conspiracy counts and (2) denied his motion for judg*395ment of acquittal.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. TrotterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. JarrettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. State v. RogelstadConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. State v. PaduaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. FelderConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. State v. SanchezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API