Hatton v. Hatton
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This is an action for divorce.
The appeal from the judgment in this case was taken long after the time allowed by law for taking such appeal, and hence cannot be considered, as this court never acquired jurisdiction thereof.
The main contention on the appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is, that the findings against her in favor of the defendant are not supported by the evidence.
The parties were married in Canada, it appears, in 1868, and after coming to this state, they ¡settled at San José, in Santa Clara County. In 1888 the husband went to Porter- ville, Tulare…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re Estate of PragerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Fallon v. FallonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Berry v. BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Navajo Nation v. MacDonaldNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 1990