Shoemaker v. State

The indictment charged that appellant and others therein named, at the time and place stated, "did then and there unlawfully and feloniously use, have in their possession and under their control a certain still. and distilling apparatus for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor in violation of the laws of the State of Indiana, contrary,” etc. It was made unlawful by §1, ch. 250, Acts 1921 p. 736, “for any person to have or possess any still, device or property for the manufacture of liquor intended for use in violation of the laws of this state,” and that act was held to be valid, and an…