Legal Opinion

Wallace v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1925No. 24,719PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGemmill, J.

Appellant and four others were charged by indictment with unlawfully and feloniously using, having in their possession and under their control a certain still and distilling apparatus for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor in violation of the laws of this state, on June 30, 1923, at Montgomery county. The indictment was predicated on ch. 33 of the acts of 1923, (Acts 1923 p. 107) approved March 1, 1923, entitled: “An Act concerning stills and distilling apparatus, and declaring an emergency.” Appellant was tried separately by jury and convicted. From judgment of fine and imprisonment, he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Denney v. State ex rel. BaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Shields v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Lindsay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Shoemaker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Philips v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Mowlan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Robbins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Lejuste v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API