Legal Opinion

Cyrus v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1924No. 24,492PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGause, J.

Appellant was convicted under an indictment returned September 14, 1922, which charged him with unlawfully possessing a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor for use in violation of the laws of this State.

The indictment was predicated upon the statute as it existed at that time (Acts 1921 p. 736, §8356d Burns’ Supp. 1921.) The part of said statute relating to the possession of stills, etc., has been superseded by Acts 1923 p. 107.

The title of the act upon which the indictment was predicated stated that it was an Act to amend certain sections of an Act entitled, “An Act prohibiting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Donovan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Baldwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Huff v. FetchIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. PayUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Burrows v. Delta Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Brown v. GrzeskowiakIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. HolderIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Guetling v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hammell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API