Sanford v. State

Appellant was convicted of a violation of §1, of ch. 33, of the Acts of 1923, same being an act concerning stills and distilling apparatus. The trial was by jury. The court rendered judgment on the verdict, fining the defendant $100 and costs, and sentencing him to imprisonment for not less than one year nor more than five years.

Alleged errors relied upon for reversal are: The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to quash the affidavit, and the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

The affidavit on which the prosecution is based, omitting the formal parts, is as…