Legal Opinion
Trade Center Properties, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1960No. Civ. 19437PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
By this proceeding in mandamus, petitioner seeks to compel the trial court to permit taking of the deposition of opposing counsel.
Petitioner, as plaintiff, brought an action against Charles and Sidney Sehonfeld for services allegedly rendered in procuring a loan from W. 0. Files and Company. Defendants’ attorney then took a statement from the president of W. 0. Files and Company. Petitioner secured issuance of a subpoena duces tecum requiring defendants’ attorney to appear for the taking of his deposition and to bring with him copy of the Files’ statement, “together with copies of any and all…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Laddon v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Grover v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.