Legal Opinion

Todd v. Occidental Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1956PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*636PERRY, J.

The plaintiff, having suffered from an accident, commenced this action to recover weekly indemnity payments as provided in defendant’s accident policy.

This policy contract provided, if plaintiff sustained bodily injuries, that payment of benefits would be made:

“A. If such injuries, directly and independently of all other causes, shah within twenty days from the date of accident, wholly and continuously disable the Insured and prevent him from performing each and every duty pertaining to his occupation, the Company shall pay the weekly accident indemnity .for the period of such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Taylor v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Penn v. Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Hutchison v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Luanne Kenna Chale v. Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Spears v. HuddlestonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Businessmen's Assurance Co. of America v. TilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API