People v. Mendez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Defendant contends that improper questioning of defense witnesses by County Court denied him a fair trial. We agree. After the prosecutor asked defendant’s first witness 11 questions, the court took over that cross-examination, asking the witness 37 more questions. When the court finished its questioning, the prosecutor had no further questions of that witness. During the prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant’s second witness, the court conveyed the impression that it did not find the witness credible by, inter alia, asking the witness, "You know what the penalty for perjury…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. Yut Wai TomNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. MoultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. JamisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. JacobsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Yadiel Roque C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. ZamoranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003