People v. Jamison
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
On the present record, it cannot be concluded that the Trial Justice unduly or improperly injected himself into the proceedings, or that he displayed bias or hostility toward the defendant’s case. As previously recognized, neither the nature of our adversary system nor the constitutional requirement of a fair trial preclude a trial court from assuming an active role in the truth-seeking process (see, e.g., People v Moulton, 43 NY2d 944, 945; People v De Jesus, 42 NY2d 519, 523). Often the Judge plays a vital…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. MoultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by90 opinions
- People v. Yut Wai TomNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DemmingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.