Legal Opinion

Allen v. Moyer

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2011No. 20090841PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1050Associate Chief Justice DURRANT,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

{ 1 In this case, we are asked to determine whether the doctrine of claim preclusion applies to small claims judgments. We conclude that claim preclusion is applicable to small claims judgments because application of the doctrine will promote finality, judicial economy, and consistent judgments.

BACKGROUND

12 The facts in this case are undisputed. In 2008, Andrew T. Allen and Melissa Moyer were involved in an automobile accident (the Accident) on Interstate 15 near Murray, Utah. Approximately two weeks later, Mr. Allen filed a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hindmarsh v. MockIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Moss v. Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & LovelessUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Gillmor v. Family Link, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hara v. ReichertNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Madsen v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API