Hara v. Reichert
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets HARA v. REICHERT 577 Cite as
287 Neb. 577
after July 1, sustained a motion to transfer him to a youth rehabilitation and treatment center. For the same reasons set forth in In re Interest of Marcella G., we affirm the decision of the juvenile court. Affirmed. Sherry Hara, appellant, v. Russell R eichert, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed March 7, 2014. No. S-13-073. 1. Judgments: Res Judicata: Collateral Estoppel: Appeal and Error. The appli- cability of claim and issue preclusion is a question of law. On a question of law, an appellate court reaches a conclusion…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bobby v. BiesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hindmarsh v. MockIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Eicher v. Mid America Financial Investment Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In re Interest of Noah B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Strode v. City of AshlandNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- McGill v. Lion Place Condo. Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Harrington v. StrongDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
- Trausch v. HagemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.