Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Mallicote

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 14, 1962No. 15,958Published

1DissentFerguson, Judge

(dissenting) :

I dissent.

My brothers and I are in full agreement on the law of this case, i.e., that an assistant staff judge advocate is disqualified to participate in the preparation of a post-trial review if he has acted as a member of the prosecution even though not formally named in the appointing orders. Indeed, such is the command of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the teaching of our cases. Code, supra, Article 6, 10 USC § 806; United States v Coulter, 3 USCMA 657, 14 CMR 75; United States v Hightower, 5 USCMA 385, 18 CMR 9; United States v Haimson, 5 USCMA 208, 17 CMR 208;…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. DickensonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. CoulterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. HaimsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. MongeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API