Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Secretary of State of NJ
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 9, 1978No. Civ. 78-2745PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIUNNO, District Judge.
Gordon has submitted to the Clerk a pro se “bill of complaint”, received November 8, 1978, together with an affidavit dated November 5, 1978 for leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The affidavit establishes that Gordon is eligible to file without prepayment of fees and costs, and a suitable order to that end will be entered.
As a civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the pleading is subject to preliminary evaluation to determine whether the same be frivolous and thus subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).
The nub of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States ex rel. Mayo v. Satan & His StaffDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Keno v. DoeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
- Ruth v. First Nat. Bank of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
- Searight v. State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
- Ruth v. Congress of United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- LaRouche v. HannahTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. CaronDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Klingler v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Carter v. IngallsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1983
- Horsey v. AsherDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.