Legal Opinion
Ruth v. First Nat. Bank of New Jersey
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 8, 1976No. Civ. 76-660PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BIUNNO, District Judge.
By order granting leave to do so under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), Ruth has been allowed to file a complaint in forma pauperis. On review of the complaint, order to show cause and affidavit in support of the complaint, the court is satisfied that the action is frivolous, and so it will be dismissed as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The reasons for this determination are set out here. The Order to Show Cause with interim restraint, signed by Ruth himself is without force or effect, of course.
The complaint is by Ruth individually, yet the claim is that certain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fay Monroe Van Meter v. Leroy Morgan, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of CalhouncountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holsey v. BassDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- Wearly v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- Keno v. DoeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
- Gordon v. Secretary of State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.