Legal Opinion

Klingler v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-6889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CAHN, District Judge.

In this products liability action, the defendants have moved to dismiss the entire action because of the absence of diversity, to strike paragraph six of the amended complaint as immaterial matter, and to dismiss Count Three of the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The motion to dismiss the entire action shall be denied; the other two motions shall be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

Michael Klingler, a citizen of Pennsylvania, alleges that, on September 26, 1987, he was thrown from an all-terrain vehicle manufactured by Yamaha…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kehr Ex Rel. Kehr v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  2. Markovich v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Blakeslee v. Clinton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Atlantic Used Auto Parts v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API