Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Grayson. Tried below before Hon. Don A. Bliss.

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, Associate Justice.

On March 25, 1896, appellee filed his original petition. On June 1, 1896, he filed his first amended original petition, and sought to recover damages of appellant by reason of appellee being injured while at work on a coal chute in Denton, Texas. It was alleged by plaintiff in his petition that the bents of such coal chute were improperly and negligently braced, and that one Ed Fink, who was the foreman of appellant in charge of such work, negligently instructed appellee as to the performance of such work, and failed to use proper care to protect appellee from danger.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LehmbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. KutacTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Dillingham, Receiver v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Missouri Pacific R'y Co. v. ChristmanTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. HalfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Pullman Co. v. MoiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. H. T. C. R. R. Co. v. GrychCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API