Legal Opinion

Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Kutac

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1890No. 2819PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from Colorado. Tried below before Hon. George McCormick-

1Opinion of the Court

HOBBY, Judge.

This is the second appeal in this cause. There seems to be no material difference between the facts of the case reported in the first appeal, 72 Texas, 643, and those contained in the record before us.

The suit was brought by appellees for damages resulting from the killing of their mother, Mrs. Annie Kutac, on February 14, 1885, in a collision between defendant’s train and a wagon in which she was riding. It was alleged that it was caused by the gross negligence of the agents ' *476and servants of the defendant in operating its train, running the same at a reckless and dangerous rate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Galveston v. KutacTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Medlin v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Sabine & East Texas Railway Co. v. HanksTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. MatulaTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. HighTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Rober v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Bower Auto Rent Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API