Adams v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
Introduction
Appellant Marshall Adams, Jr. appeals his convictions for theft of a vehicle and evading arrest or detention using a vehicle. In his sole point, appellant contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the evidence obtained using a “bait” vehicle. We affirm.
Background Facts
The Fort Worth Police Department’s Covert Organized Bait Recovery and Apprehension (COBRA) program deploys “bait” vehicles in areas of the City with a high rate of auto thefts. According to the testimony of Fort Worth Detective Ward Robinson, who was a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Dacus, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Keith D. Hamilton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Keith D. Hamilton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Kimberly Evette Butler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.