Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Tuneup Masters
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 10, 1987No. C000057PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
William Jenkins and Nathalie Munk (landlords) appeal from an unfavorable judgment in an unlawful detainer action. The trial court gave judgment for the tenant, Tuneup Masters, on the ground that it had exercised an option to extend the lease. The notice of extension was lost in the mail. The landlords contend that the court erred because the notice was not mailed in the manner required by the lease and because there is insufficient evidence to support a finding that the notice was mailed at all. We disagree and will affirm the judgment.
In the published portion of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Leasing Associates, Inc. v. Slaughter & Son, Inc., and F. E. Slaughter, as GuarantorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- California State Automobile Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Thompson v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- 11382 Beach Partnership v. LibawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. FrerichsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- C.T., a minor by and through his Guardian Ad Litem PAMELA ROSS v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, MELISSA OLSZEWSKI (fka Melissa Walker), SHAWN HALLAND, and DOES 1–50District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.