Legal Opinion

11382 Beach Partnership v. Libaw

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1999No. G018485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.

J.Tenant 11382 Beach Partnership (Beach) appeals from the judgment quieting title in favor of landlord Jacob Libaw. Libaw cross-appeals, contending the trial court erred in failing to award damages. Libaw also appeals from an attorney fees and costs award, complaining it was too low. We affirm the portion of the judgment quieting title in Libaw and the attorney fees and costs award. We reverse and remand the portion of the judgment denying Libaw damages.

I

Libaw leased commercial premises to Beach. The written lease provided the term expired April 30, 1996, but…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gonzales v. R. J. Novick Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Scott v. CIBA Vision Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Dawson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grand Prospect Partners v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Padilla v. McClellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Hill v. Affirmed Housing GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Grand Prospect Partners v. Ross Dress for LessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API