Legal Opinion

Matthiessen v. Grand

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1928No. Docket No. 6315PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants and cross-complainants, quieting title to a private roadway across plaintiff’s land, and enjoining the maintenance of obstructions thereon.

Plaintiff brought an action to enjoin defendants from trespassing on his land. The defendants filed a cross-complaint claiming an easement by prescription to a 12-foot roadway some 10 miles in length across the premises of plaintiff from their adjoining ranch to a public highway beyond, and alleging that plaintiff had obstructed said right of way by constructing and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Kripp v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Crosier v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Community Feed Store, Inc. v. Northeastern Culvert Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Bartholomew v. StaheliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API