Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Conrad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 2006No. 06-1145PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Edward Conrad, an attorney from Sig-ourney, was cited by the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board with violations of several disciplinary rules. Our Grievance Commission found, based largely on stipulated facts, that Conrad had failed to render an accounting to a client as requested and failed to respond to the board’s notices of his client’s ethical complaint. The commission recommended a public reprimand, but we conclude he should be suspended for one month.

I. Review.

In attorney disciplinary matters, our scope of review is well established:

Where “no appeal is taken…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. DaggettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. SproleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. Jeffrey M. IrelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. LickissSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. Jeffrey M. IrelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API