Waite v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
The jury found that plaintiffs’ answers on a health insurance application were false but did not materially affect the risk. We reverse the trial court’s order for judgment notwithstanding the verdict but affirm the trial court’s alternative ruling of a new trial.
In January 1980, plaintiff-appellants Rockne Waite and his wife Elaine applied for family health insurance with defendant-respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company. Mr. Waite completed the medical history questions on the application form, answering (1) that Elaine, in the past 10 years, had not been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Brown v. Arthur Schuster, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
3Cited by11 opinions
- Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Clifford v. Geritom Med, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Haugen v. International Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Beck v. American Sharecom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Isker v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.