Legal Opinion

Isker v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1985No. C6-84-643PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Scorpion contends the trial court erroneously granted plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Appellant asserts there was sufficient evidence presented at trial to support the jury’s finding that respondent Isker was contributorily at fault for injuries he sustained as a passenger on a snowmobile. We reverse.

FACTS

After dark on the evening of December 8, 1978, respondent Robert Isker sustained severe hand injuries after falling from a snowmobile manufactured by Scorpion Industries, Inc., (Scorpion) and driven by Roger Gardner. Isker brought…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Olson v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Coenen v. Buckman Building CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Collette v. ClausenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Goodwin v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Goodwin v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API