People v. Caravella
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HERNDON, Acting, P. J.
Defendant appeals from the judgment (order granting probation) entered following a nonjury trial that resulted in his conviction for pandering in violation of Penal Code section 266i. He contends (1) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction; and (2) that evidence of certain recorded telephone conversations was improperly introduced against him. We have concluded that these contentions are unmeritorious.
Appellant operated a “photography studio” at 7400 Santa Monica Boulevard where persons desiring so to do could photograph nude girls. One of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RagenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. OsunaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. ChatfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. CarbonieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- State v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- People v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. ToweryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.