Legal Opinion
People v. Chatfield
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1969No. Crim. 13747PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.
Following a court trial defendant was con victed of three offenses: (1) attempted grand theft from Jackie Metcalf, (2) attempted grand theft from Concetta Jor gensen, and (3) grand theft from Moisés Heilbron. This appeal is from the judgment.
Since there is no room for doubt as to the sufficiency of the evidence, it is unnecessary to relate the facts in any detail. Disregarding conflicts in the evidence (see People v. Mills (1947) 30 Cal.2d 694, 700 [185 P.2d 11]) the following are some of the circumstances on which the judgment rests.
Defendant is a chiropractor. The criminal offenses arose…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. VillarrealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. BrandowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. CoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. CaravellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.