Legal Opinion
People v. Ragen
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1968No. Crim. 2867PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (Gerald), P. J.
Frank J. Ragen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of raping a female under the age of 18 years (Pen. Code, §261, subd. 1), raping a female prevented from resisting by his having administered an intoxicating narcotic or anesthetic substance (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. 4), and two counts of sex perversion (Pen. Code, § 288a).
As of May 26, 1966, Ragen, a general medical practitioner, was treating 16-year-old tonsillitis patient Diane. On that date, Diane appeared at Ragen’s office at 5:40 p.m., as he had instructed her. No receptionist…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. MabryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. StullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. MiddletonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- People v. DontanvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.