Legal Opinion
Weinberg v. Gold
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 12, 2012No. Civil No. JKB-11-3116PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Arnold Weinberg has brought this shareholder’s derivative suit on behalf of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., against various officers and directors of the company, alleging issuance of a false and misleading proxy statement in violation of section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) The complaint indicates the pivotal event leading to this lawsuit was a “say on pay” vote1 by the shareholders on May 25, 2011, in which a majority of the shares voted rejected the 2010…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raul v. RyndDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Morefield v. BaileyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Gordon v. SznewajsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Boxer v. Accuray Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Epstein v. Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.