Legal Opinion
Boxer v. Accuray Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 29, 2012No. Case No. C 12-5722 SBAPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REMANDING ACTION
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
The parties are presently before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Dkt. 7. Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with this matter and being fully informed, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to remand, but DENIES Plaintiffs request for an award of fees and costs. The Court, in its discretion, finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 78(b); N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-l(b).
I. BACKGROUND
On November 1, 2012, Plaintiff Robert Boxer filed a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Moore-Thomas v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.