Kimmelman v. Heather Downs Management Limited
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right an order granting summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8), failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, and denying his motion to amend the complaint. We affirm.
A grant or denial of summary disposition is reviewed de novo on the basis of the entire record to determine if the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 118; 597 NW2d 817 (1999). A motion brought under MCR 2.116(C)(8) should be granted only where the complaint is so legally deficient that recovery would be impossible even if all…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Suchodolski v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Lytle v. MaladyMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- McNEILL-MARKS v. MIDMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER-GRATIOTMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Landin v. Healthsource Saginaw, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- William Berrington v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Shaw v. City of EcorseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Jeremy Hoven v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.