Legal Opinion

AFSCME LOCAL 818 v. City of Waterbury

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 21, 2005No. 3:04CV1787 (JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS [.DOCS. ## 32, 347

ARTERTON, District Judge.

This is an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by two labor organizations, AFSCME Local 818 (“AFSCME”) and the Waterbury City Employees Association (“WCEA”), and one individual plaintiff, Brian Lister, representing current City of Waterbury employees. 1 Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief prohibiting defendants from implementing Connecticut Special Act No. 01-1, (“Special Act” or “Act”), 2001 Conn. H.B. 6952 (Reg.Sess.), which placed Waterbury’s finances under the supervision of the Financial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Concord Teachers (Nh Ret. System)Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. Walker v. City of WaterburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  3. Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. v. Village of SchaumburgDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  4. Alhariri v. BlinkenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API